fig. 1 film poster |
Based off Yasutaka Tsutsui’s novel of the same name,
‘Paprika’ is a 2006 film directed by Satoshi Kon. The Japanese film takes
cultural roots of its origin encompassing NEET culture, Maneki-nekos (lucky
cats) and variation in character proportions. While the film’s plot is easier
to follow the animation creates a more complex and confusing story. Never the
less the style proves to be one of the defining features of the film. ‘Paprika’
follows Doctor Atsuko Chiba who must recover several stolen devices that allows
one to enter another’s dream.
With the plot in mind it is possible to seed several themes
into the story, one of which is more evident. In the words of the antagonist of
the film, the chairman, “the dreams are horrified… that their safe refuge is
destroyed by technology.” While it is clear that the chairman disapproves of
new technology it also highlights the potential fear. There have been many
films before that have explored technology getting out of hand, one of the more
famous examples being ‘Terminator’ (1984). Despite being a far stretched
technophobic example its represents a similar concept shown in ’Paprika’. The
device while invented for the betterment of humanity proved powerful and in the
wrong hands capable of great damage. This falls into the long and arduous
debate of whether or not technology should become so powerful. The device itself
proves so, without limitations it can merge both reality and dreams. The dream
aspect is well portrayed though kon’s choice in medium.
fig.2 an example of the dream world |
The story is portrayed through the use of animation in the style of anime (synonymous to Japanese culture), mixing 2D and 3D elements. This form of animation is a product that is commonly associated with NEET culture as mention above. A culture that has been recognised as a rising issue in society as industry targets mostly males of ages up to 30. Due to the harsh circumstances and expectations of Japanese society it is easier for some to find escape in media and indulging in animation and its associated products. Despite this the anime style has been able to portray a number of individual and unique styles. Variation in character proportions, movement and design gives anime a large expanse in ways of expressing itself.
Tsutsui’s world is presented in a manner of various playful colours mixed in with a large amount of morphology. This is heavily present throughout the dream sequences as inanimate objects come to life and the abstract begins to intrude the real world. Animation has been used to tell many stories some more ordinary than others, in the case of ‘Paprika’ the medium is used to great effect in shaping and describing the dream world. The style is also well known for the 1988 film ‘Akira’ which proposes a number of mad and explosive moments. ‘Paprika’ is not too dissimilar in this manner. The two worlds of reality and dreams are well defined with reality being far more mundane contrasted by the dramatic dream world. Critic Alex Naylor describes kon as ‘an engineer of delirious, dizzy trips through the psyche, but a spiky, tough social critic too’ (2008) which is evident in this particular piece of work.
Since the 2006 film there was plans of a live adaptation,
directed by Wolfgang Petersen. However the animation provides a unique style to
the story that a live-action retelling cannot recreate, limiting the amount of
creative choices possible. This became evident when Christopher Nolan’s
‘Inception’ (2010) was released during the early stages of development of
Petersen’s film. It appears that due to the similar natures of the concepts
Petersen stopped progress as its success as a more original film would have
been restricted. This further provides support that animation played a pivotal role
in the film.
The director, Satashi Kon sadly passed away in 2010 before
he could complete his next work ‘Dreaming Machine’. Never the less it is clear
that Kon has a strong image that he has planned for each of his work being able
to execute and direct his team to fulfil his dream. Critic Paul Jackson
comments on this ‘renowned for injecting a staggering level of lived-in detail
into each of his compositions’ (2008) moving on to describe how much detail
each shots contains.
Bibliography
Jackson, P. (2008). Paprika.
[Online] Available at: http://www.midnighteye.com/reviews/paprika/
[Accessed: 28/01/18]
Naylor, A. (2008). Paprika:
the stuff of dreams for. [Online] Available at: filmgoershttps://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2008/jun/17/paprikathestuffofdreamsfo
[Accessed: 28/01/18]
Illustration list
fig. 1. Film Poster [Online] Available at: http://img.moviepostershop.com/paprika-movie-poster-2006-1020689313.jpg [Accessed: 28/01/18]
fig. 2 An example of the dream world [Online] Available at: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-VCQcLnj4q8UlUstfIHjNlXlZtLnmyPNEh_eTSsvnQ-njBWSDZQVq7z9bEdV5rLrQDaj496tsAmTN5ie-4BdqyF91K-hB4Iaduciycs1NQ_zXB1kL7FyFmXmV6QNsudHnxCXnJBQrLoov/s1600/paprika.jpg [Accessed: 28/01/18]
You should explain NEET culture more in your review. Always assume the reader doesn't know and give them a brief intro. Take a look at the films below...
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZsFQPdU2dw&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brF1zVXG5_0&t=594s